Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Livio Serra's avatar

I should say from the start that although I sometimes write in fragments myself, I paradoxically have very little tolerance for fragmented work as a reader, precisely because not everyone knows how to do it. When it is done badly it feels like a shortcut, a way of avoiding the harder work of sustained narrative. So I came to this with a particular kind of resistence. The opening section with the flowers could have bored me to death. I hate wit heavy irony. I could write an essay on how much I dislike wit. And yet it worked. It made me fear the whole piece would be like that, and then it was not. What disarmed me was realising the irony was not the destination, it was a way of building expectations in order to dismantle them, and that dismantling is part of how the piece functions itself. Dianthus is the moment where you realise you know what you are doing. “Would smell so cheap” closes on three levels at once, the flower, the relationship, and the act of sending flowers as an apology. The 02:52 message section is, in my view, the most formally brillant. That timestamp carries real weight. “Sent at 02:52” says everything about who that man was and the state you were in. Then 1997 is the most vulnerable piece. The form is more traditional, less defensive. It lands even harder precisely because it comes after sections that are heavily armoured. The prose section on ego-dystonic thought is where the collection becomes something larger. It is not disorganised, it is how dissociation actually works, that juxtaposition of the grandiose and the mundane. “Shall we” is unbearable in the best way. British politeness as a form of polite violence. There would be another three hundred things to say, but I risk never finishing. What sets you apart from others working in this style is your restraint. You know when to stop. You never overreach or push the reader with the idea of impact for its own sake. It hits, but I am never forced to feel that it is hitting me. It just happens. And I think that restraint is not only aesthetic, in a collection that deals with relational violence, with control, with bodies held under pressure, choosing not to exert pressure on the reader is also an ethical act. The form mirrors the content in reverse: where the relationships described force and withhold, the writing lets go.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Greg McKee's avatar

Woah Suzie! This should be in print! You write with such strength and courage 🖤🖤🖤

29 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?